|
|
|
| |
|
|
PHI Privacy/Offshore
07 - 06 - 03 - 08 - 05 - 02 - 04 - 01 -
Susan Purdue broadcast. sm - Nan 20:30:08 04/22/04, Re:
(0)
India in 2020? There is a vision - Read this and you will be ROFL 15:12:48 04/22/04, Re:
(41)
Sadly, this is not sarcasm, nor satire; they're deadly serious (sm) - TJ 20:01:42 04/22/04, Re:
(30)
But we can't expect that we will never have competition... - Hoobastank 20:22:09 04/22/04, Re:
(26)
A Compliment for Hoobastank! (sm) - TJ 07:11:09 04/29/04, Re:
(5)
thanks for the message, TJ :) nm - Hoobastank 15:47:32 04/30/04, Re:
(3)
I somehow didn't think that was a compliment. Maybe I am wrong. sm - Cheryl 17:13:13 04/30/04, Re:
(2)
doesn't matter the motive, really, was just thanking for the message. sm - Hoobastank 21:42:55 04/30/04, Re:
(1)
I'm glad you stand against offshoring. sm - Nan 07:24:29 05/01/04, Re:
(0)
Thanks for letting us know about this site TJ. I appreciate it. nm - Nan 12:43:37 04/29/04, Re:
(0)
I Don't Consider it "Competition" of Any Sort ... (sm) - TJ 14:53:52 04/23/04, Re:
(0)
Sadly this is not sarcasm, nor satire ..... - skb 20:34:28 04/22/04, Re:
(18)
I haven't heard of that for college; there are government ... sm - Hoobastank 20:44:46 04/22/04, Re:
(8)
Who are you? sm - Nan 20:49:03 04/22/04, Re:
(7)
I'm a female, a U.S. citizen born in Medford, Oregon... sm - Hoobastank 22:02:44 04/22/04, Re:
(3)
Well traveled. sm - Nan 06:52:55 04/23/04, Re:
(0)
wow, you are well traveled for someone so young - ecotrin 23:56:13 04/22/04, Re:
(1)
hi there, nice to see another night owl... here's my story.. - Hoobastank... 00:19:08 04/23/04, Re:
(0)
She/he does appear well read and maybe well traveled. That is a plus point - and does not necessarily anything else. See her other posts 21:14:53 04/22/04, Re:
(2)
Thanks... :) nm - Hoobastank 21:38:05 04/22/04, Re:
(0)
How can you tell it's a she? I am just asking a question. nm - Nan 21:18:42 04/22/04, Re:
(0)
I have been to the MTIndia.com site and you are so right. sm - Nan 20:38:41 04/22/04, Re:
(8)
because, believe it or not, we are idolized. - Hoobastank 20:55:47 04/22/04, Re:
(7)
So true. Once in a while, I have to remind myself that their (sm) - Kris 22:22:37 04/22/04, Re:
(1)
Hi Kris... sm - Hoobastank 22:58:03 04/22/04, Re:
(0)
Actually, no, most of the applications were for engineering. sm - Nan 21:19:49 04/22/04, Re:
(2)
I see... but that's why I also said they probably come ... - Hoobastank 21:27:52 04/22/04, Re:
(1)
The majority of them were not accepted for admission. sm - Nan 11:51:12 04/23/04, Re:
(0)
That is correct, Indians grow up idolizing America - It is a dream come true for them to come to the USA 21:12:04 04/22/04, Re:
(1)
I am many things, but confused is not one of them. nm - Nan 21:20:54 04/22/04, Re:
(0)
I guess you are right. I have seen much of it here, that's for sure. nm - Nan 20:16:37 04/22/04, Re:
(0)
TJ, you have hit it on the head - wake up call for us. sm. 20:10:41 04/22/04, Re:
(1)
Fine, they should recreate history ... but not at our expense (nm) - TJ 14:57:11 04/23/04, Re:
(0)
of course it's sarcastic, but it does make one think... sm - Hoobastank 17:13:57 04/22/04, Re:
(9)
I don't think it's sarcastic. I think it's satire. sm - Nan 17:44:20 04/22/04, Re:
(8)
wow... didn't expect a response like that... sm - Hoobastank 19:42:28 04/22/04, Re:
(6)
What do you expect on an - Nan 19:46:14 04/22/04, Re:
(5)
Should be what do you expect on an 'offshore concern' board. sm - Nan 19:47:43 04/22/04, Re:
(4)
Because I'm surprised certain people can't make the distinction.. sm - Hoobastank 20:02:45 04/22/04, Re:
(3)
Oh and by the way.. sm - Nan 20:19:00 04/22/04, Re:
(0)
Speak for yourself. nm - Nan 20:12:54 04/22/04, Re:
(0)
Exactly - right 20:12:38 04/22/04, Re:
(0)
To answer your question, America is considered unique worldwide because, sm, - it is a country of immigrants and therefore open to all those who want to immigrate 18:55:27 04/22/04, Re:
(0)
US BPO moves unconstitutional! - read this 15:05:10 04/22/04, Re:
(6)
Time to give Shannon and Stuart a call (sm) - TJ 20:09:10 04/22/04, Re:
(2)
If we all retaliate, we won't be able to export any products - and the US became a superpower because in 19th, 20th centuries, we exported worldwide 20:21:09 04/22/04, Re:
(1)
Show me where you got your stats (nm) - TJ 14:56:15 04/23/04, Re:
(0)
What totally amazing Bull$h*t!. India still doesn't understand that this - country is run by the PEOPLE. We can vote the talking heads out of DC sm 18:46:04 04/22/04, Re:
(0)
The key paragraph being.... sm - Nan 15:20:10 04/22/04, Re:
(0)
That's a joke. Hell, we finance every other country on this planet! - nm 15:15:49 04/22/04, Re:
(0)
Let's talk about those who pilfer personal information because of GREED! - SM 06:23:48 04/22/04, Re:
(39)
You still don't get it, do you? sm - Nan 06:31:12 04/22/04, Re:
(38)
I don't think you get it either, the indian folks were charged and will be tried - SM 06:37:13 04/22/04, Re:
(37)
Nan is just using the privacy issue to try to stop offfshoring, - so far not one medical record's privacy has been breached overseas 10:59:28 04/22/04, Re:
(11)
You all SAY that bit about "no one's interested in so-and-so's history...." (sm) - sm Kris 16:21:48 04/22/04, Re:
(2)
right but identity theft of US nationals happens in the usa - far far more than elsewhere, in spite of US laws 17:35:53 04/22/04, Re:
(1)
Not saying it doesn't happen in the U.S. - sm - Kris 22:00:45 04/22/04, Re:
(0)
That's bull. Ever since PHI has been outsourced as well as - sm 15:18:53 04/22/04, Re:
(0)
Oh, breaching, extorting, ransoming, blackmailing.... sm - Nan 13:44:12 04/22/04, Re:
(5)
Girlfriend, you left out how they're out to destroy our economy. - sm 15:17:26 04/22/04, Re:
(4)
Yep, and to top it off, there are those who admit that it's their ultimate (sm) - Kris 16:13:34 04/22/04, Re:
(2)
There is way too much the govt is not - sm - MG 20:19:44 04/23/04, Re:
(0)
Thanks for adding that, I knew I was forgetting something! nm - Nan 15:21:54 04/22/04, Re:
(0)
Lots of breaches have been made. Now the Indians just extort then breach. - nm 12:17:10 04/22/04, Re:
(0)
how can they be tried when they are in another country? - ms 09:41:38 04/22/04, Re:
(0)
There is no record of the perps in India or in Pakistan having been - charged, let alone tried, fined or punished in any way. sm 07:58:18 04/22/04, Re:
(9)
Yes there is. Nan herself linked to it. - Answering your question 08:14:54 04/22/04, Re:
(7)
I linked to the original stories. sm - Nan 08:54:54 04/22/04, Re:
(6)
There won't be until they actually stand trial, just like there won't be here - Answering your question 09:03:35 04/22/04, Re:
(5)
I say again, there is no record of charges having been filed in either - case, only what was reported in the press (unreliable over there at best) sm 10:17:36 04/22/04, Re:
(1)
I hope you have better luck explaining than I have! Thanks! nm - Nan 10:26:58 04/22/04, Re:
(0)
And how will be know that they will stand trial. How? sm - Nan 09:05:56 04/22/04, Re:
(2)
Ooops, should be how will - Nan 09:08:03 04/22/04, Re:
(1)
continuation from above, how will 'we' know. nm - Nan 09:08:48 04/22/04, Re:
(0)
Thank you. sm - Nan 08:04:20 04/22/04, Re:
(0)
Please tell me how you can possibly know that. sm - Nan 06:43:11 04/22/04, Re:
(13)
How can you possibly know they will not be? I think you just wish it was so - SM 06:46:36 04/22/04, Re:
(12)
Ah, the racist card. How predictable. nm - Nan 07:01:53 04/22/04, Re:
(0)
You yourself linked to publised articles about the Indians being - SM 06:47:39 04/22/04, Re:
(10)
So I linked to articles, so what? sm - Nan 06:50:24 04/22/04, Re:
(9)
I guess those articles are in the same place the US articles - Answering your question 07:00:25 04/22/04, Re:
(8)
You really need to stop the personal attacks. Consider this a warning. nm - Moderator 07:54:35 04/22/04, Re:
(1)
I consider that a compliment coming from you. sm - Nan 07:05:24 04/22/04, Re:
(5)
Bravo for Nan!!! Think you're hitting it on the head.... (sm) - Kris 10:22:32 04/22/04, Re:
(4)
you are dead wrong, other countries are as good as the - USA. Don't wave stats. You have to live there to find out 11:02:55 04/22/04, Re:
(3)
Sure, whatever you say. You can go right ahead and live (or keep on living) sm - Kris 16:07:00 04/22/04, Re:
(0)
Look, MTs like me and Kris and the others on this board built this sm - Nan 13:47:57 04/22/04, Re:
(1)
Amen - more inside - Florida MT Too 04:46:32 04/23/04, Re:
(0)
The facts about MedQuist..... - Aware (sm) 19:00:47 04/21/04, Re:
(7)
Great, now other offshoring companies can jump in to - bid for VA contracts 19:31:27 04/21/04, Re:
(2)
No they can't. There is a clause in the contract that specifically - prohibits offshoring dictation. nm 19:33:00 04/21/04, Re:
(1)
So lie, that's all CBay did and it works for them. nm - saynotoindia 20:23:59 04/21/04, Re:
(0)
I believe you, but I just wanna see the source - care to share?? Thanks. - nm 19:07:29 04/21/04, Re:
(3)
Sorry, VA is very tight regarding the white paper. I'm on the inside, so I've - seen it. But, you can do some research and see how the VA has awarded (sm) 19:19:54 04/21/04, Re:
(2)
VA Opportunities - Sharon 07:10:47 04/30/04, Re:
(0)
I'm surprised anybody bids on them at all - Grumble 21:29:48 04/21/04, Re:
(0)
Why are most people on this board afraid of offshoring: - let us enbrace offshoring 15:30:52 04/21/04, Re:
(30)
I don't think the real issue here is "fear". If, in fact, - thinking MT 07:05:18 04/22/04, Re:
(0)
Give me one good reason why my outrageous tax dollars should - sm 17:36:37 04/21/04, Re:
(9)
Here is one good reason: - Think about it openly 18:15:58 04/21/04, Re:
(8)
Hmmmmmmm.....(sm) - Kris 19:22:31 04/21/04, Re:
(0)
And someone said....sm - Nan 18:17:02 04/21/04, Re:
(6)
LOL - good one, Nan! He must have come back in the form of (sm) - Kris 19:04:21 04/21/04, Re:
(5)
:) Now he will have to go look up who Timothy Leary is. nm - Nan 19:09:01 04/21/04, Re:
(4)
I guess the phrase of the day is "Tune in, turn on, and drop out," eh?? nm - Kris 19:10:40 04/21/04, Re:
(3)
Oh, my gosh, I had forgotten that phrase. sm - Nan 19:20:52 04/21/04, Re:
(2)
Oops....(sm) - Kris 19:27:01 04/21/04, Re:
(1)
Well, I just told MY age then! :) nm - Nan 19:44:08 04/21/04, Re:
(0)
You're either kidding or you're from one of those "worldwide" areas who *want* - the wealth? 15:34:30 04/21/04, Re:
(17)
Nothing - wrong with that 15:36:29 04/21/04, Re:
(16)
You mean global welfare. I'm not interested. - nm 17:37:17 04/21/04, Re:
(15)
Ya got THAT right. If we continue to support the world, the US so-called..sm - Puhleeze! 18:01:05 04/21/04, Re:
(14)
all civilizations go thru a period of up and down, - who knows the usa will rise again 500 years from now 18:29:35 04/21/04, Re:
(2)
Sure buddy - (sm) - Kris 18:43:13 04/21/04, Re:
(1)
Ditto that. I'll "enbrace" that idea when: (sm) - Kris 18:27:58 04/21/04, Re:
(10)
if you well and truly believe what you write, - you have nothing to be worried about 18:38:03 04/21/04, Re:
(8)
In answer to what I can gather is your question....(sm) - Kris 19:00:19 04/21/04, Re:
(5)
Keep talking. Tell us all your sinisters plans for our jobs. nm - Nan 19:45:47 04/21/04, Re:
(0)
Fer shurrrr...(sm) - Kris 19:45:00 04/21/04, Re:
(2)
And, of course, assuming you are a - Nan 18:41:50 04/21/04, Re:
(1)
Left out a word, assuming you are a 'we'. nm - Nan 18:43:18 04/21/04, Re:
(0)
Whoo hooo!!!! Way to go, Kris! nm - Nan 18:30:41 04/21/04, Re:
(0)
BH, you have important mail.nm - Catwoman 06:03:03 04/21/04, Re:
(0)
Indian MTs superior to American MTs. sm - Nan 07:07:25 04/20/04, Re:
(64)
Telephone Calls - BH 20:33:01 04/20/04, Re:
(16)
To Catwoman - BH 08:42:01 04/21/04, Re:
(2)
I went straight to the office of the CEO. The other avenue would be to speak - directly with the head of customer relations and give him/her an earful. You are welcome. Hope this helps. Catwoman nm 12:28:04 04/21/04, Re:
(0)
Thanks for the Help - BH 10:39:02 04/21/04, Re:
(0)
The number IS for Citibank sm - sb 07:57:24 04/21/04, Re:
(0)
When I googled this number, it came up with a message sm - JG 05:49:39 04/21/04, Re:
(1)
Sorry, I didn't read earlier messages stating the very sm - JG 06:42:28 04/21/04, Re:
(0)
That's impossible. I'm familiar with every aspect of this website-sm - Moderater 01:03:31 04/21/04, Re:
(9)
I didn't find the post insulting; I googled the phone number and came-sm - V 06:00:58 04/21/04, Re:
(6)
The OP clearly stated that the number referred back to this website. sm - Moderator 07:42:28 04/21/04, Re:
(4)
If you go to the googled site--it does refer back to this website-sm - V 08:17:23 04/21/04, Re:
(0)
If you click the link in the Google search it takes you back to this board - sb 07:52:04 04/21/04, Re:
(2)
Right, but that number does not belong to MTStars, it belongs to Citibank. - Someone merely posted the number here saying they were being harassed. nm 08:28:03 04/21/04, Re:
(0)
Okay. Thank you for clarifying that. The way that the OP sm - Moderator 08:16:03 04/21/04, Re:
(0)
Whoops-I mean to say I didn't find the post "harassing" (not insulting)-nm - V 06:02:06 04/21/04, Re:
(0)
PHONE NUMBER AND MT STARS. see message - Catwoman 05:58:32 04/21/04, Re:
(1)
859 Number - BH 08:33:12 04/21/04, Re:
(0)
Warning for those who want to go into coding (sm) - TJ 18:53:12 04/20/04, Re:
(2)
We were just talking about this at dinner tonight. sm - Nan 19:19:17 04/20/04, Re:
(1)
Yes, I had been thinking about going into coding, but points like this, (sm) - Kris 10:03:52 04/21/04, Re:
(0)
We need to band together and take action! - Sandy 10:41:11 04/20/04, Re:
(11)
Support anti-offshoring bills in your state would be one thing - - sm 11:24:30 04/20/04, Re:
(9)
Your instincts have proved you right again. sm - Moderator 17:39:46 04/21/04, Re:
(1)
If it's not a word, it should be! :) Thank you! nm - Nan 18:18:56 04/21/04, Re:
(0)
Outsourcing - Sandy 14:04:53 04/20/04, Re:
(0)
Sheri Steadman, who owns this site, has some great ideas. sm - Nan 11:04:12 04/20/04, Re:
(0)
I just left a message on Chris Hopkins voice mail taking him up on his offer. sm - Absolutely fuming! 08:03:35 04/20/04, Re:
(26)
Good Going!!!! I wrote the author of the article. sm - Nan 08:10:07 04/20/04, Re:
(25)
AAMT just got MTs classified as a "profession" a few years ago. sm - Yankee 08:13:27 04/20/04, Re:
(24)
You are so right. I am furious! sm - Nan 08:18:11 04/20/04, Re:
(23)
Thank you for attaching that - that last letter was mine (sm) - Kris 10:35:42 04/20/04, Re:
(3)
Thanks for the information, Kris! sm - Nan 10:45:59 04/20/04, Re:
(2)
Linda McAuley is a Bean Counter who Should Butt OUT (sm) - TJ 18:48:21 04/20/04, Re:
(1)
And then there was this letter. sm - Nan 08:22:26 04/20/04, Re:
(18)
A ? for Dr. Jayaswal - Sheila 06:58:30 04/21/04, Re:
(5)
Ditto Sheila's message - and some of us have had firsthand (sm) - Kris 10:45:17 04/21/04, Re:
(0)
But there was no breach in confidentiality! Everything I have seen said - OH 08:09:16 04/21/04, Re:
(3)
How do we know that? nm - Nan 08:25:48 04/21/04, Re:
(2)
But there was no breach in confidentiality! Everything I have seen - skb 15:28:52 04/21/04, Re:
(1)
A better question is, were YOU there. nm - Nan 15:58:55 04/21/04, Re:
(0)
Of course he's going to write that type of letter. He's Indian! nm - Good God 08:35:10 04/20/04, Re:
(11)
I personally say phooey. Yes, that pretty much says it all. nm - Nan 16:00:36 04/21/04, Re:
(9)
25% of all doctors in the US are foreign born and trained. - And they don't mind outsourcing at all 16:52:53 04/21/04, Re:
(8)
Not quite the same subject, but...... - SC 07:57:08 04/30/04, Re:
(0)
So why do they come over here? To suck our economy dry? - sm 17:44:01 04/21/04, Re:
(6)
Probably doing the same thing your ancestors did, trying to - Why? 17:47:33 04/21/04, Re:
(5)
Fine, tell that to your family when you lose your job to them. nm - Nan 17:50:51 04/21/04, Re:
(4)
I don't understand why you are so determined to wish people ill luck? - Why? 18:05:31 04/21/04, Re:
(1)
I am talking about offshoring. I don't know WHAT you are talking about. nm - Nan 18:15:57 04/21/04, Re:
(0)
Next time you post something like that, be sure to do at least a - sm 07:48:16 04/20/04, Re:
(4)
Sorry, wader warning posted! And I agree with you by the way! nm - Nan 07:55:11 04/20/04, Re:
(3)
Yes, that article is truly nauseating....(sm) - Kris 10:51:14 04/20/04, Re:
(2)
By the way, Kris. sm - Nan 11:02:03 04/20/04, Re:
(1)
Thank you so much, Nan. I would have written it differently a little later, (sm) - Kris 11:28:50 04/20/04, Re:
(0)
Anyone see the current Advance Magazine! sm - Nan 15:34:53 04/14/04, Re:
(65)
Three is "lots" ? - Gran 09:25:46 04/19/04, Re:
(36)
And your point is? sm - Moderator 10:26:36 04/19/04, Re:
(0)
There were four letters. There is limited space. sm - Nan 10:08:49 04/19/04, Re:
(34)
There probably were enough to fill several pages, as stated above there is only - disgusted 10:58:43 04/19/04, Re:
(25)
JAAMT has a letter to the editor this month re: offshoring. sm - Nan 11:13:16 04/19/04, Re:
(24)
I resent an MT in India being published in JAAMT. I'm not prejudiced against - disgusted 11:26:42 04/19/04, Re:
(23)
Your post reeked of prejudice. If you don't like it don't join them. - Oh good grief! 12:01:08 04/19/04, Re:
(7)
Maybe you'd fit in better over at Jay's AAMT board where him and the Indians - sm 12:49:09 04/19/04, Re:
(2)
I don't seem to see any stroking over there. Perhaps you should actually - Funny 14:03:29 04/19/04, Re:
(1)
Any American feeding the enemy the same lines that he's feeding us - sm 14:55:01 04/19/04, Re:
(0)
No personal attacks. If you have something to say, which sm - Moderator 12:46:27 04/19/04, Re:
(2)
No personal attacks? What about the post above mentioning people by name? - OH 06:05:17 04/21/04, Re:
(1)
Then you need to point out which post to me and I'll check it out. sm - Moderator 14:53:47 04/21/04, Re:
(0)
HELLO!! Do you read the entire posts before you post? I admit I am prejudiced - disgusted 12:29:03 04/19/04, Re:
(0)
It is baffling. sm - Nan 11:30:32 04/19/04, Re:
(14)
Yep, they have a very small percentage of U.S. MTs as members...(sm) - Kris 12:27:14 04/19/04, Re:
(12)
I've heard about that rumor as recently as 5 years ago and yes, AAMT does - sm 12:47:33 04/19/04, Re:
(0)
I had heard that about the CMT. sm - Nan 12:41:58 04/19/04, Re:
(10)
I worked a lady who grandfathered. She wears her CMT - Tsa 10:35:14 04/20/04, Re:
(2)
I never said it was the right thing to do .. only pointing - thinking MT 05:55:32 04/21/04, Re:
(1)
Oh, I AGREE!!!!! sm - Nan 06:22:08 04/21/04, Re:
(0)
You're right. I've met radiology MT's who only type radiology, yet are CMT's. - disgusted 12:55:31 04/19/04, Re:
(6)
Actually, I think there was a point in their history when - thinking MT 20:56:41 04/19/04, Re:
(5)
And you know this how? The test? Are you saying that you've taken - sm 04:18:09 04/20/04, Re:
(4)
Oh no, this sounds like Gran who yesterday only wanted to argue and stir up - disgusted 07:30:29 04/20/04, Re:
(1)
No, not an "AAMT rep." Two friends took the - thinking MT 05:50:18 04/20/04, Re:
(1)
Sorry, thinking MT, but this adds more to my resolve not to associate in any - way w/AAMT (even as a nonmember, as you suggested). nm. Kris 10:19:42 04/20/04, Re:
(0)
Oops, I meant writer, not writing. nm - disgusted 11:32:15 04/19/04, Re:
(0)
So what offshore company do you work for? As heavily as you're picking at these - disgusted 10:46:50 04/19/04, Re:
(7)
Methinks she just likes to stir things up. Too negative - just ignore! nm - Kris 10:57:52 04/19/04, Re:
(0)
What in the world are you talking about? sm - Nan 10:55:11 04/19/04, Re:
(5)
Sorry Nan, not you -- Gran. She has to be from an offshore company. nm - disgusted 10:59:47 04/19/04, Re:
(4)
Why do you all automatically assume someone works for offshore if they do not - Gran 11:08:06 04/19/04, Re:
(2)
From what you have shown on this board, you are not one to comment on sm - Nan 11:15:22 04/19/04, Re:
(1)
No problem. Thanks for qualifying! nm - Nan 11:01:21 04/19/04, Re:
(0)
I'm talking to Sheri about that right now and unfortunately, sm - Yankee 17:02:15 04/15/04, Re:
(27)
I think I might have confused some people. sm - Nan 17:40:55 04/15/04, Re:
(26)
About confusion. Is the author of the letter the one who was - Suzanne 20:44:45 04/15/04, Re:
(13)
Author of which letter? Now, I am confused! nm - Nan 22:24:43 04/15/04, Re:
(0)
They didn't publish or even respond to my letter, they just published the - disgusted 21:58:28 04/15/04, Re:
(11)
Is there proof that he is in fact a - Suzanne 22:16:40 04/15/04, Re:
(10)
The owner of the company gave him a slap on the wrist and made sure the evidence - disgusted 09:39:39 04/16/04, Re:
(9)
And you know this how? - Gran 13:17:12 04/18/04, Re:
(8)
Kind of sounds like you're defending him. Why would it have to be either he - disgusted 08:25:33 04/19/04, Re:
(1)
Nope, I just think it is stupid blaming a magazine for printing - Gran 09:21:33 04/19/04, Re:
(0)
What else would you call looking at porno of young girls on his work computer? - disgusted 08:23:11 04/19/04, Re:
(5)
Since I am looking at the magazine and there is only one name of the three - Gran 09:24:19 04/19/04, Re:
(4)
I'm not referring to the current issue, that's not what I said. - disgusted 09:50:25 04/19/04, Re:
(3)
You implied that one of the current letters printed in Advance - Gran 11:09:56 04/19/04, Re:
(1)
This is not at all what I implied. You should get your facts straight before - disgusted 11:29:58 04/19/04, Re:
(0)
The issue before last had some inaccuracies about Acusis, as well. sm - Nan 10:11:39 04/19/04, Re:
(0)
If anybody's confused, it's me, trust me on that one. sm - Yankee 17:52:18 04/15/04, Re:
(11)
I definitely agree, especially on the education part. sm - Nan 18:12:22 04/15/04, Re:
(9)
They won't publish it for the fact that you too will threaten - Yankee 18:21:11 04/15/04, Re:
(8)
But they posted these other folk's letters supposedly stating the "truth" - Gran 09:28:17 04/19/04, Re:
(6)
My letter to them was not for publication. sm - Nan 10:13:17 04/19/04, Re:
(5)
Hopefully you were more polite to her than you are when responding - Gran 11:11:19 04/19/04, Re:
(4)
Since you seem to have the handle on rudeness in this forum and sm - Nan 11:28:41 04/19/04, Re:
(3)
I agree with Gran, Nan is wrong on this one - Openness is the key 16:55:57 04/21/04, Re:
(1)
What? nm - Nan 17:09:28 04/21/04, Re:
(0)
Bravo, Nan!! Well stated. nm - Kris 12:12:43 04/19/04, Re:
(0)
No truer words were ever spoken! nm - Nan 18:24:28 04/15/04, Re:
(0)
India is most infected country for AIDS, beats Africa. - See link for details 07:38:56 04/13/04, Re:
(50)
This quote from article PROVES U.S. laws cannot be enforced in India (sm) - TJ 06:16:34 04/15/04, Re:
(27)
well, I don't agree with infringing on another patent, but sm - info. 11:45:42 04/15/04, Re:
(0)
A shame that it isn't a crime...sm - Kris 11:35:16 04/15/04, Re:
(25)
Important Point! sm - TJ 11:53:48 04/15/04, Re:
(22)
Oh, I see....sm - Kris 12:18:52 04/15/04, Re:
(21)
It is far more basic than healthcare in these countries - thinking MT 06:46:38 04/18/04, Re:
(1)
To clarify....(sm) - Kris 10:42:19 04/19/04, Re:
(0)
You seriously think it is any easier to get treated for HIV/AIDS here, with no - CLY 13:10:10 04/15/04, Re:
(18)
I gather that, from your various posts...(sm) - Kris 13:56:08 04/15/04, Re:
(17)
Turning away the indigent and the uninsured - thinking MT 09:45:07 04/16/04, Re:
(2)
Hill Burton and private hospitals. sm - Nan 12:39:31 04/16/04, Re:
(1)
Thanks Nan .. - thinking MT 18:32:54 04/17/04, Re:
(0)
Turning away the indigent and the uninsured - thinking MT 09:45:05 04/16/04, Re:
(0)
US healthcare is the joke of developed countries - Gurgle 14:19:50 04/15/04, Re:
(12)
Wait, are you saying third world countries are developed sm - Nan 17:45:02 04/15/04, Re:
(2)
You misunderstood - - Gurgle 18:52:28 04/15/04, Re:
(1)
Yes, I know that. sm - Nan 19:45:52 04/15/04, Re:
(0)
I'm not comparing it to other developed countries. (sm) - Kris 14:37:39 04/15/04, Re:
(8)
So what you're saying - Gurgle 17:13:56 04/15/04, Re:
(0)
Are you living in the same U.S. the rest of us are? - Gran 15:09:33 04/15/04, Re:
(6)
She isn't wrong, you know. sm - Nan 08:16:12 04/16/04, Re:
(2)
Information - developed countries and healthcare in America - Gurgle 11:56:05 04/16/04, Re:
(1)
That really wasn't what I was going for. sm - Nan 14:36:58 04/16/04, Re:
(0)
You're probably thinking along the lines of trouble with HMO's/insurance (SM) - jm 15:59:53 04/15/04, Re:
(0)
Look around.....sm - Kris 15:24:49 04/15/04, Re:
(1)
No, they don't - Gurgle 17:16:08 04/15/04, Re:
(0)
Phoolan Devi was also a butcher/murderer in her own right. - nm 11:40:49 04/15/04, Re:
(1)
True...sm - Kris 11:51:39 04/15/04, Re:
(0)
What I find especially appalling...sm - ks 10:20:41 04/13/04, Re:
(21)
Reply - Covered Entity sm 19:08:34 04/14/04, Re:
(0)
To the person who repeatedly makes the snippy comment-sm - Moderator 14:26:26 04/13/04, Re:
(16)
Note to Moderator - sm - A Fan 04:53:55 04/15/04, Re:
(11)
India Prime Minister - myopinion 05:30:34 04/15/04, Re:
(3)
The poster is absolutely right about Indira Ghandi. My apologies. - sm 08:03:47 04/15/04, Re:
(2)
A woman running any country is the exception, certainly we don't have one here - CLY 08:05:29 04/15/04, Re:
(1)
And thank God that we don't! - nm 07:42:49 04/18/04, Re:
(0)
Indira Gandhi was PM of India for quite awhile and very respected worldwide. - nm 05:29:41 04/15/04, Re:
(6)
Do you think Indira Gandhi would have become PM ... (sm) - TJ 06:12:13 04/15/04, Re:
(5)
And that negates everything she accomplished? Or is it just that it's India? - nm 06:54:50 04/15/04, Re:
(4)
What did I say????? (sm) - TJ 08:03:33 04/15/04, Re:
(3)
You said the only reason she was elected was because of family connections, and - msg 08:30:32 04/15/04, Re:
(1)
"you object to the thought that India elected a female PM" WRONG (sm) - TJ 10:09:15 04/15/04, Re:
(0)
Nor would anyone without high government connections make it very - CLY 08:06:34 04/15/04, Re:
(0)
Moderator - myopinion 04:08:57 04/15/04, Re:
(0)
MedQuist Clams Up - Company fails to Respond to Questions; New SEC - filings Indicate Stock Listing in Jeopardy - see article clickable link inside 14:17:03 04/12/04, Re:
(0)
Now they are stealing our R&D jobs - Interesting article 20:43:57 04/11/04, Re:
(1)
More Indian propaganda. Have you also seen the articles - about US corps pulling back their RD because of Indian incompetence? nm 05:40:05 04/12/04, Re:
(0)
India more open than US & Japan: - Interesting article 20:13:29 04/11/04, Re:
(1)
Of course, note the dateline -- New Delhi... Ya gotta love that Indian - propaganda! nm Hmmmmm... 05:38:48 04/12/04, Re:
(0)
Have you seen this Newsweek article? Interesting - J 08:08:29 04/11/04, Re:
(0)
HAPPY EASTER from the staff at MTStars! - Sheri, Yankee, Tiny, TJ, and PJ nm 15:03:16 04/09/04, Re:
(5)
Happy Easter everybody! sm - Mel 21:27:56 04/09/04, Re:
(0)
Happy Resurrection Day everybody! Thanks Sheri :) nm - Yankee 16:19:29 04/09/04, Re:
(2)
Happy Easter to you, too! nm - Nan 15:34:27 04/09/04, Re:
(0)
Ya know, I've always wondered how many jobs MQ has sent - overseas. Peg 18:48:37 04/08/04, Re:
(0)
Be sure and visit this site, let Susan Purdue know how you feel. sm - Nan 17:04:15 04/08/04, Re:
(0)
...Another new twist - or is it new? sm - LoriCalif 10:58:15 04/08/04, Re:
(2)
Just what we need....(sm) - ks 01:31:53 04/09/04, Re:
(0)
I hope Bill Fishburn sues the other Offshoring MTSO site for SLANDER! - Theresa 01:16:20 04/08/04, Re:
(8)
Self-admittedly his report is full of incorrect information. - sm 06:21:07 04/13/04, Re:
(1)
I read what Susan said. sm - Nan 16:30:39 04/13/04, Re:
(0)
You have to commit slander to be sued for it don't you? - Good grief 03:52:51 04/08/04, Re:
(5)
I think you don't know the whole story. I know the specific details and I can - tell you that MQ is in a whole world of trouble over this. (sm) 08:29:40 04/08/04, Re:
(4)
From Doug Cain, who set up Susan Purdue's website... - I'm going to disagree with you here, Susan. You (sm) 19:33:08 04/07/04, Re:
(3)
stopping them in their tracks.. - formeremployeeandnotdisgruntled! 09:35:25 04/10/04, Re:
(0)
offshoring - Linda 08:19:14 04/08/04, Re:
(1)
You said it, Linda!!! Way to go! nm - Nan 13:27:22 04/08/04, Re:
(0)
Thank you, Susan! - US MT 16:18:59 04/07/04, Re:
(2)
So do I!!!! nm - Nan 16:25:39 04/07/04, Re:
(1)
thank you, susan - catherine 07:50:45 04/08/04, Re:
(0)
A message from Susan Purdue (see inside) - Administator 10:27:09 04/07/04, Re:
(2)
Corporate blackmail to shut someone up. - Don't you love it 21:20:51 04/07/04, Re:
(0)
Thank you, Sheri! sm - Nan 15:32:20 04/07/04, Re:
(0)
Article in Creative Loafing - MT 06:59:57 04/07/04, Re:
(14)
Do you have a link to this story? sm - Nan 09:45:25 04/07/04, Re:
(2)
Here is the link - MT 10:41:32 04/07/04, Re:
(1)
It worked and I thank you hugely!!!! nm - Nan 10:49:59 04/07/04, Re:
(0)
It's snowballing! sm - Nan 08:09:28 04/07/04, Re:
(0)
follow up to MT - Ml 07:29:38 04/07/04, Re:
(9)
I doubt it. Agencies like AAMT and MTIA will just lobby stating that the, sm - Yankee 11:50:40 04/07/04, Re:
(6)
follow up on MT - catherine 13:02:28 04/07/04, Re:
(5)
AAMT is not the only one saying it. Advance Magazine sm - Nan 13:04:54 04/08/04, Re:
(2)
Advance published an article by a known pedophile, who happens to be an MT, - disgusted 19:31:35 04/08/04, Re:
(1)
They did not respond to me either. sm - Nan 19:51:46 04/08/04, Re:
(0)
My girlfriend just this past month has landed four ex-MQ, sm - Yankee 13:10:24 04/07/04, Re:
(1)
This is VERY interesting! sm - Nan 08:18:52 04/16/04, Re:
(0)
Now if we could just get Perot Systems to wake up to the reality - Covered Entity nm 07:36:00 04/07/04, Re:
(1)
should be SM to above post, not NM - Covered Entity nm 07:36:56 04/07/04, Re:
(0)
Main Board post. sm - Nan 06:41:35 04/07/04, Re:
(3)
follow up to Nan - ml 06:48:37 04/07/04, Re:
(1)
Might have been PJ, whom he interviewed on the Power Hour broadcast...sm - Kris 08:25:31 04/07/04, Re:
(0)
DONATING TO SUSAN / SIGNING PETITION - Theresa 01:00:51 04/07/04, Re:
(7)
Thank you, this is wonderful. And it love it that sm - Nan 06:18:44 04/07/04, Re:
(6)
Susan has respectfully asked that no one make any donations. (sm) - Administrator 10:46:38 04/07/04, Re:
(5)
That's wonderful of her...to not want to be seen an opportunist... - Theresa 11:22:12 04/07/04, Re:
(3)
That is a great idea. sm - Nan 11:39:04 04/07/04, Re:
(2)
I don't think Susan's an opportunist at all. sm - Yankee 15:58:56 04/07/04, Re:
(1)
She is making a difference. And paying a high price. sm - Nan 16:27:21 04/07/04, Re:
(0)
I am sorry to hear that someone did that. But not surprised. sm - Nan 10:52:28 04/07/04, Re:
(0)
CBay cutting pay and laying off MT's, but read this . . . - ex-CBayer 08:43:16 04/06/04, Re:
(0)
Check the Main Board for "Another Medquist Story." It'll send chills up your - spine. nm 04:46:36 04/06/04, Re:
(8)
A question... - catherine 19:08:24 04/06/04, Re:
(0)
Catch Susan tonight 9 pm CST, link inside (MedQuest/Vets) - PJ 18:21:07 04/06/04, Re:
(3)
PJ, on the Main Board, Catherine had suggested....(sm) - Kris 22:55:07 04/06/04, Re:
(1)
Job well done, Kris! nm - Nan 06:39:34 04/07/04, Re:
(0)
Thank you for posting this!!!!!! I sent it to all my friends. nm - Nan 18:32:08 04/06/04, Re:
(0)
This is unbelievable! sm - Nan 08:00:11 04/06/04, Re:
(2)
A QUESTION .... - Well Wisher 18:39:00 04/06/04, Re:
(1)
Time will tell. I plan on listening to the broadcast and finding out. nm - Nan 18:42:24 04/06/04, Re:
(0)
Bank of America to cut 12,500 jobs - Covered Entity sm 20:08:45 04/05/04, Re:
(1)
Corporate Double Speak - Covered Entity sm 20:13:32 04/05/04, Re:
(0)
Ready for a Worker Shortage in just 6 years? - Another one 18:36:30 04/05/04, Re:
(0)
One Giant Global Labor Pool? - Interesting article 18:32:50 04/05/04, Re:
(0)
An Indian American Who is Anti-Offshoring ... (sm) - The REAL TJ 10:55:04 04/05/04, Re:
(5)
TJ, where do you dig up all these news articles from. - LOL 14:58:13 04/05/04, Re:
(2)
Off a messageboard where pro and anti offshorers bat each other around (nm) - TJ 18:36:46 04/05/04, Re:
(1)
www.isyourjobgoingoffshore.com: lots of great news article & great boards nm - TJ 18:38:14 04/05/04, Re:
(0)
This is great!!! Thanks for posting this, TJ. nm - Nan 13:46:47 04/05/04, Re:
(0)
Thank you Mr. Laxmi for validating every point I've been trying to make for the - last three years. Catherine Graham 13:42:27 04/05/04, Re:
(0)
Labeling products - Glyn 07:53:06 04/05/04, Re:
(1)
That is an excellent point! nm - Nan 07:58:27 04/05/04, Re:
(0)
ADDITIONAL MTSO WHO OFFSHORE - Well Wisher 19:21:32 04/04/04, Re:
(44)
Yes, like Heartland, and we all know about Heartland... sm - Nan 20:52:06 04/05/04, Re:
(0)
Offshore Transcription - Joe Storey, President and CEO of TransHealth 06:40:11 04/05/04, Re:
(4)
God Bless you!!!! nm - Nan 06:43:34 04/05/04, Re:
(2)
Hmmmmmm - justanmt 17:51:54 04/05/04, Re:
(1)
Yes, I believe he did. sm - Nan 20:53:33 04/05/04, Re:
(0)
TransHealth. sm - Nan 05:55:41 04/05/04, Re:
(34)
Sorry but Transhealth is not on the list? - Well Wisher 19:52:51 04/05/04, Re:
(33)
It was on the list when you orginally posted it. Along with several others. nm - Nan 20:47:11 04/05/04, Re:
(32)
So the administrators can edit posts here with no sign that the posts have been - edited? That's scary. How do we know that all posts here aren't edited to show the view of one person? nm 11:56:57 04/06/04, Re:
(31)
Thats what used to happen on MT Daily and why so - ARG 13:10:54 04/06/04, Re:
(24)
I believe that most people who come here know that offshoring sm - Nan 19:13:43 04/06/04, Re:
(0)
I would never equate THIS site with THAT site. sm - Nan 13:16:34 04/06/04, Re:
(21)
Really? I didn't see it explained by the person doing the altering. - If you hadn't pointed it out, would anyone have noticed? Eye opener nm 14:39:27 04/06/04, Re:
(3)
Answers to concerns inside - Moderator 14:44:31 04/06/04, Re:
(2)
The names of the companies in the post were not CONFIRMED - to actually outsource offshore, so yes the post was edited. (sm) 15:02:31 04/06/04, Re:
(0)
Really? I sure would, right down to altering posts - ARG 13:42:25 04/06/04, Re:
(16)
This site will remain free. We would shut our site down first before we would - ever resort to charging visitors. Administrator 15:10:08 04/06/04, Re:
(0)
Then why do you come here! For heaven's sakes! sm - Nan 13:48:26 04/06/04, Re:
(13)
This is a for profit site, it says so in the TOS, not a charity to donate to. - ARG 14:13:08 04/06/04, Re:
(12)
I've been out of the loop for several weeks but what's so bizarre, sm - Yankee 16:38:41 04/06/04, Re:
(1)
Absolutely! nm - Nan 18:15:32 04/06/04, Re:
(0)
Let me straighten out a few of your misconceptions. sm - Moderator 14:50:51 04/06/04, Re:
(5)
I count 28 sponsors. At $300 a year that's $8400 a yr. Web space costs $240/yr - or $500/yr at most. I'd say upwards of $8000 is pretty good for maintenance. Eye opener nm 17:28:26 04/06/04, Re:
(4)
We also pay a tech contractor $800.00 a month to work on the site. You weren't - aware of that were you? This over 10,000 page website (sm) 20:22:40 04/06/04, Re:
(1)
More like eyes wide shut. sm - Nan 18:21:47 04/06/04, Re:
(1)
I meant knock but knowing yourself is good thing too! :( nm - Nan 18:36:29 04/06/04, Re:
(0)
Oh brother. nm - Nan 14:46:25 04/06/04, Re:
(2)
Again, thank you Nan for your assistance for helping out here sm - Moderator 14:53:30 04/06/04, Re:
(1)
I wish I could do more. Thank you. nm - Nan 19:49:15 04/06/04, Re:
(0)
I don't think that is what happened at all. sm - Nan 13:00:05 04/06/04, Re:
(3)
NAN... WELL WISHER IS HE :::)))) - Well Wisher 17:43:34 04/06/04, Re:
(2)
Thanks for clarifying! nm - Nan 18:16:40 04/06/04, Re:
(1)
YOU ARE WELCOME .... - Well Wisher 18:31:48 04/06/04, Re:
(0)
Food for thought - Larry Norris 13:53:35 04/04/04, Re:
(13)
Absolutely and then sue the company for breach of contract - because they did not make full disclosure that our proprietary programming sm 08:12:20 04/05/04, Re:
(0)
You are asking the wrong people this question. sm - Nan 14:04:43 04/04/04, Re:
(11)
Not to mention they're privacy. - nm 14:22:17 04/04/04, Re:
(10)
Privacy? - Well Wisher 19:06:13 04/04/04, Re:
(9)
Identification data stripped = medical malpractice headlines for wrong patient - Covered Entity nm 09:53:43 04/05/04, Re:
(5)
Nah, it's not any worse than when a tired doctor dictates the wrong - patient identifiers and a surgery on a different patient. nm 02:19:26 04/06/04, Re:
(4)
And so you wish to ADD to the chances of medical malpractice? - Covered Entity sm 10:36:33 04/07/04, Re:
(2)
You all know the drill: do ANYTHING, absolutely ANYTHING to keep offshoring (nm) - The REAL TJ 10:59:28 04/07/04, Re:
(1)
Good and then they can hold the "wrong" patient's medical records sm - Nan 03:19:53 04/06/04, Re:
(0)
As a medical provider, the Precyse "solution" scares the bejezus - out of me and for very obvious reasons - never mind the privacy issues. nm 08:14:19 04/05/04, Re:
(2)
Private information is not only in the demographics. It is also all throughout - the report. There is no way to automatically extract that information. (sm) 08:28:13 04/05/04, Re:
(1)
YOU MAY WANT TO VISIT ... - Well Wisher 18:55:58 04/06/04, Re:
(0)
The Causes And Consequences Of America's Job Crisis - Roger Conklin 13:44:06 04/04/04, Re:
(2)
FINALLY, someone who understands that the "global economy" is NOT global and - that there is no such thing as free trade. He also understands that sm 08:17:03 04/05/04, Re:
(1)
Tell that to the chief financial officers in charge of cutting costs for corps. - Covered Entity sm 09:57:07 04/05/04, Re:
(0)
US, China, India seen in supremacy race by 2020 - read this 11:39:54 04/03/04, Re:
(3)
I read about that in 1995 in a book about the end times and - sm 12:50:01 04/03/04, Re:
(2)
What's the title of that book? I'm interested in reading it (NM) - TJ 11:48:17 04/04/04, Re:
(1)
if it's the same one I read, it's - info. 11:58:57 04/04/04, Re:
(0)
hey ex-CBbayer - concerned 07:33:40 04/03/04, Re:
(2)
Leopards don't change their spots and neither will CBay. At least you - ex-CBayer 10:14:11 04/04/04, Re:
(1)
Leopards don't change their spots and neither will CBay. - concerned 14:39:06 04/04/04, Re:
(0)
According to the media, they created 120,000 jobs last month. How many of -- sm - Mel 16:05:40 04/02/04, Re:
(0)
This week's Advance magazine. sm - Nan 11:20:32 04/02/04, Re:
(80)
I know for a fact... sm - info. 14:27:03 04/02/04, Re:
(78)
I wrote to Linda Gross, the author of this article. sm - Nan 07:57:42 04/03/04, Re:
(76)
You should have sent her to this one as well - sm 10:32:16 04/03/04, Re:
(73)
If you want her to know, you can tell her. Thanks. nm - Nan 10:57:49 04/03/04, Re:
(72)
So, you don't want a real look at how the records get abused, only one that - sm 11:38:18 04/03/04, Re:
(71)
You're the one who isn't being real. We can apply laws here, not over there. - Stop overlooking the obvious. nm 12:40:31 04/03/04, Re:
(51)
They did apply the laws over there. Two people are sitting in jail, what more do - sm 12:49:48 04/03/04, Re:
(50)
Please read the article (sm) - TJ 15:12:41 04/04/04, Re:
(0)
NO they are not sitting in jail! sm - TJ 14:44:31 04/04/04, Re:
(7)
If an American did that, they would be fired and taken to court! - Some thoughts...sm 17:18:35 04/04/04, Re:
(6)
These Indians were fired, they were put in jail, they are being taken to court. - ARG 05:19:01 04/05/04, Re:
(4)
How do we know that? nm - Nan 05:39:59 04/05/04, Re:
(3)
Do you mean Lazarus did not check his facts before printing them? - ARG 06:46:09 04/05/04, Re:
(2)
What David Lazarus said. sm - Nan 06:55:00 04/05/04, Re:
(0)
How in the world did you get that out of my post? nm - Nan 06:48:07 04/05/04, Re:
(0)
I'm glad you mentioned the training. sm - Nan 17:39:41 04/04/04, Re:
(0)
The Privacy Act 2000 has only actually prosecuted a handful of people since - its inception. What does THAT tell you? Again, laws overseas DO NOT protect anyone in the US. (sm) 16:00:46 04/03/04, Re:
(40)
Ah, the "privacy laws" in the third world and how they will protect us (sm) - TJ 15:05:37 04/04/04, Re:
(0)
How many people have been prosecuted here? Only a handful as well. - sm 06:40:34 04/04/04, Re:
(29)
Lubna Baloch is a good example that the system THERE sm - Nan 06:44:39 04/04/04, Re:
(28)
The gentleman in Texas who stiffed her and has yet to be caught is a good - sm 07:04:25 04/04/04, Re:
(27)
I don't think there is proof yet this man even existed... sm - info. 10:56:59 04/04/04, Re:
(10)
The why isn't MT Stars investigating this lady like they did the Pakistani - sm 11:12:59 04/04/04, Re:
(9)
Personally, and not representing MTStars with this post, I'm personally - Moderator (sm) 08:45:16 04/05/04, Re:
(1)
MTStars is an organization? How much is membership? - How do I join? I thought it was just a web site, are they official now? 11:52:23 04/06/04, Re:
(0)
It's not the same crime though....sm - info. 11:45:43 04/04/04, Re:
(0)
How do you know they aren't? nm - Nan 11:13:59 04/04/04, Re:
(4)
The Texas MTSO is for real. He is Sonya Newman Udeshi's stepfather. It's all a - family thing. Sonya Udeshi runs Medical Data Services, which by the way is still in operation, (sm) 14:33:21 04/04/04, Re:
(3)
Sonya, et al, still breached their contract with Transcription Stat and I, for - sm 08:48:45 04/05/04, Re:
(0)
So are you saying that is actions forced her to commit extortion! nm - Nan 07:06:33 04/04/04, Re:
(15)
Nope I am that she has been punished by loss of work and the American - sm 11:05:16 04/04/04, Re:
(0)
She should be punished by loss of work. sm - Nan 10:59:20 04/04/04, Re:
(2)
No I am not. I am saying she has been punished. He has not. You just seem to - sm 11:07:07 04/04/04, Re:
(1)
Is info said in their post, we do not even know that this man exists. sm - Nan 11:10:21 04/04/04, Re:
(0)
Do you think no one here commits extortion? Blaming an entire country for one - sm 07:17:28 04/04/04, Re:
(8)
sounds like "don't confuse me with the facts" sm - quest 10:03:32 04/04/04, Re:
(4)
Since the very same punishment was handed to the two indians as would - sm 10:53:09 04/04/04, Re:
(2)
to you it can be told an infinite number of ways and it would still ... sm - quest 19:45:41 04/04/04, Re:
(0)
You are missing the point. sm - Nan 11:08:50 04/04/04, Re:
(0)
should have been continuing. Addendum to ending statement: say so and do so.nm - quest 10:11:54 04/04/04, Re:
(0)
Blaming an entire country? sm - Nan 07:24:58 04/04/04, Re:
(2)
How many MTs are you currently hiring? Do you own a service? - sm 07:33:11 04/04/04, Re:
(1)
Let me get this straight. sm - Nan 07:34:55 04/04/04, Re:
(0)
That should be "his" actions. :) nm - Nan 07:08:28 04/04/04, Re:
(0)
It TELLS me that only a handful of people have violated - the law. What does it TELL you? sm 00:21:17 04/04/04, Re:
(8)
It tells me the same thing, and it also tells me the sysem is working properly - sm 06:37:55 04/04/04, Re:
(7)
Only it didn't stop them before they happened. sm - Nan 07:04:09 04/04/04, Re:
(6)
And to this day MTs do the very same things right here and don't - sm 07:05:56 04/04/04, Re:
(5)
Really? Name some. Just one. Anyone. Who are you anyway? nm - Nan 07:07:41 04/04/04, Re:
(4)
I doubt it. sm - Nan 06:50:03 04/05/04, Re:
(0)
Why should I? You are quite capable of doing a search. - sm 07:18:24 04/04/04, Re:
(1)
That's what I thought. Thanks for proving my point. nm - Nan 07:25:39 04/04/04, Re:
(0)
Wow, you got all of that out of me just telling you to tell her yourself! sm - Nan 11:59:31 04/03/04, Re:
(0)
Nobody is trying to ignore the problems here... sm - info. 11:55:12 04/03/04, Re:
(17)
In Larazuses article it said the people responsible were in jail and - sm 12:23:36 04/03/04, Re:
(15)
Did YOU Actually Read that Article??? (sm) - TJ 15:11:21 04/04/04, Re:
(0)
Those were the two from Heartland, not Lubna Baloch. The Heartland office was in - India. Lubna Baloch is in Pakistan, she has not been punished, and (sm) 16:10:58 04/03/04, Re:
(7)
India and Pakistan hate each other. sm - Geography 101 17:09:45 04/03/04, Re:
(6)
Correction 101 - info. 23:58:00 04/04/04, Re:
(0)
The majority of MT work is in Pakistan. (sm) - TJ 14:58:16 04/04/04, Re:
(4)
People get confused thinking that Pakistan is India. - sm 15:41:12 04/04/04, Re:
(3)
I don't get them confused. nm - Nan 16:25:22 04/04/04, Re:
(2)
Nan, I know that you don't get confused. You're very well informed. sm - Moderator 17:41:11 04/04/04, Re:
(1)
I came late to the fray. sm - Nan 17:47:22 04/04/04, Re:
(0)
As far as I am aware, Lubna Baloch never saw jail time. sm - Nan 12:42:01 04/03/04, Re:
(5)
She didn't even get a slap on the wrist and is still transcribing. sm - Nope 12:48:56 04/03/04, Re:
(0)
The article you posted below specifically says the two - sm 12:48:47 04/03/04, Re:
(3)
I am talking about Lubna Baloch here. sm - Nan 13:07:59 04/03/04, Re:
(2)
Nan, I just wanted to let you know that I really appreciate your posts and sm - A fan 14:56:03 04/03/04, Re:
(1)
We can all make a difference! sm - Nan 17:48:51 04/03/04, Re:
(0)
Well said. I agree. nm - Nan 12:00:42 04/03/04, Re:
(0)
great, hopefully she can make good use out of the information..sm - info. 10:30:36 04/03/04, Re:
(1)
The article says he is CEO and President of Acusis. sm - Nan 11:00:55 04/03/04, Re:
(0)
Wow! This sheds a whole new light on the subject! sm - Nan 15:55:28 04/02/04, Re:
(0)
Propaganda. sm - Nan 13:03:01 04/02/04, Re:
(0)
Interesting article - Neicko 10:19:37 04/02/04, Re:
(0)
Be sure and read David Lazarus' new article, it's a pip!!! sm - Nan 05:24:20 04/02/04, Re:
(8)
Absolutely amazing... - US MT 06:42:00 04/02/04, Re:
(1)
Follow up to USMT - ml 06:56:27 04/02/04, Re:
(0)
article - ml 06:35:17 04/02/04, Re:
(0)
And to think that Heartland was AAMTs employer of the year a few years ago! sm - Bravo to Dave! 05:51:40 04/02/04, Re:
(2)
What is the AAMT criteria for choosing an MTSO of the year? nm - The REAL TJ 09:04:09 04/02/04, Re:
(1)
It probably tells you on their website. - sm 12:29:14 04/02/04, Re:
(0)
Ban Earthlink - they're outsourcing. Techs left = zero service. - nm 21:59:59 04/01/04, Re:
(0)
A word in parting.... - Jay 11:42:16 04/01/04, Re:
(20)
Jay, I would ask you to seriously reconsider your decision to leave, you - were the lone sane voice here. Please don't leave 08:12:42 04/04/04, Re:
(1)
No one can say that you are not persistent. Wrong, but persistent. nm - Nan 08:18:51 04/04/04, Re:
(0)
I beg your pardon. That is a matter of opinion. nm - Nan 19:54:04 04/02/04, Re:
(0)
Have good days, Jay. nm - Mel 21:57:31 04/01/04, Re:
(1)
He will! He has a lot of new offshore MTs to pal around with! nm - The REAL TJ 09:10:37 04/02/04, Re:
(0)
PAID "Consultant" ... 'nuff said.... nm - .. 21:14:44 04/01/04, Re:
(0)
What about your new message board for foreign MTs (sm) - The REAL TJ 12:08:46 04/01/04, Re:
(5)
Please provide a link where Jay specifically says he is "pro" offshoring. - wondering 12:12:42 04/01/04, Re:
(4)
Stop playing childish word games. - nm 09:25:37 04/02/04, Re:
(0)
You ARE joking, right? Specifics? You know as well as the rest of us here that - Jay chooses his words VERY carefully and in doing so makes his points (sm) 13:05:34 04/01/04, Re:
(1)
It's called telling somebody to go to hell and making them look forward - SM 17:38:35 04/01/04, Re:
(0)
I'm disgusted. I just visited the forums for members at the AAMT website and saw - a forum called MT Around The World. It was interesting to see that JAY VANCE is the moderator. (sm) 00:10:48 04/01/04, Re:
(28)
I've Visited the Online AAMT Chapter a Few Times ... (sm) - TJ 05:57:27 04/01/04, Re:
(13)
Re AAMT: I think they're digging their own grave. nm - Mel 22:53:48 04/01/04, Re:
(0)
My vote. sm - Nan 08:21:52 04/01/04, Re:
(11)
I Didn't Know That He Comes Here to Gather Fodder for Other Boards (sm) - The REAL TJ 09:35:22 04/01/04, Re:
(0)
Are you all serious? Every post of his has been ultrapolite, respectful - sm 08:47:21 04/01/04, Re:
(7)
Oh no you don't. He is NOT working for the same goals! Take a look at what he - used to stand for only a couple short years ago. It's a FAR cry from how he stands now (sm) 09:13:31 04/01/04, Re:
(6)
Well, you sure weren't supporting it when he folded it up due to lack of - sm 09:26:33 04/01/04, Re:
(4)
Speak for yourself! I sent money to Jay to join his organization because I - respected his pro-American MT stance. nm 09:30:25 04/02/04, Re:
(0)
Excuse me, I most certainly DID support his cause back then! I've been in this - industry for nearly 3 decades and when I saw what he was trying to do back then (sm) 13:14:53 04/01/04, Re:
(0)
There were a lot of MT's who stepped up the plate to help. sm - Don't go there 09:31:50 04/01/04, Re:
(1)
Maybe his organization wasn't MANAGED properly? (sm) - The REAL TJ 09:39:06 04/01/04, Re:
(0)
A standing ovation to Peg! nm - It's a sad day 09:16:43 04/01/04, Re:
(0)
No, what he does is go back there and complain about us sm - It's a sad day 08:25:22 04/01/04, Re:
(1)
I think "quick prestige" has something to do with it, as well. sm - Nan 09:43:00 04/01/04, Re:
(0)
And Jay thinks that we're supposed to take him and his word seriously? sm - It's a sad day 04:16:18 04/01/04, Re:
(11)
Okay, here is what bugs me. sm - Nan 05:34:19 04/01/04, Re:
(6)
Too bad that long time member chose not to share her views with the general - sm 11:06:22 04/01/04, Re:
(5)
She gave the speech at an AAMT meeting in Colorado. sm - Nan 16:17:19 04/01/04, Re:
(4)
This is a speech she delivered at a chapter meeting? - sm 05:05:41 04/02/04, Re:
(3)
Did you read the speech? sm - Nan 05:21:34 04/02/04, Re:
(2)
Yes, I read it. If she expects other AAMT members to help make - sm 11:15:26 04/02/04, Re:
(1)
How do you know she hasn't? sm - Nan 13:40:31 04/02/04, Re:
(0)
How is that any different from this site's insistance that using Canadian - sm 05:06:35 04/01/04, Re:
(3)
How is it taking jobs from the US? sm - Nan 05:19:08 04/01/04, Re:
(2)
At least we have open fair trade agreements with Canada. sm - It's a sad day 06:16:36 04/01/04, Re:
(1)
Great post!!! nm - Nan 08:13:35 04/01/04, Re:
(0)
It's sad. Jay used to be against offshore -- not so anymore. - nm 03:39:27 04/01/04, Re:
(0)
AAMT is branching out. They are going worldwide. sm - Nan 03:35:48 04/01/04, Re:
(0)
There was a post on this board which said all hospitals in the US offshore - Kathy 08:44:15 03/31/04, Re:
(6)
The National Manufacturing Association will stand up to you - Covered Entity sm 09:30:42 03/31/04, Re:
(5)
I wonder just how much "sanctions" would sm - justanmt 17:42:06 03/31/04, Re:
(0)
I agree; Then the same principle applies to service jobs and therein lies the - Kathy 09:49:23 03/31/04, Re:
(3)
If the US middle class is unemployed, who's gonna buy all the imported goods? nm - Curious 14:51:04 03/31/04, Re:
(2)
I guess Congress will cross that bridge when they get to it. - Covered Entity sm 15:35:03 03/31/04, Re:
(1)
Once it hits them the wallet when they don't have any taxpayers ... sm - The REAL TJ 09:29:30 04/01/04, Re:
(0)
Is there a list or board for Hospitals and Clinics that send offshore? - sm - Jeannie 18:04:24 03/30/04, Re:
(15)
Your local healthcare providers are required to tell you who they - use for transcription but ONLY IF YOU ASK SPECIFICALLY. sm 04:02:49 03/31/04, Re:
(13)
Outsourcing - Judy 16:07:49 04/10/04, Re:
(0)
Really? Who exactly makes that requirement? Is it a law or something? - sm 05:45:59 03/31/04, Re:
(9)
Since there are so many different states, you'd have to ask a local - atty. It's called INFORMED CONSENT and FULL DISCLOSURE. sm 06:12:53 03/31/04, Re:
(8)
But that is only if you are their patient. They don't have to tell anyone - sm 06:30:42 03/31/04, Re:
(7)
If you live in the area, you are a potential patient. This is especially true - of your local hospital. If you ask, they must tell you. nm 07:50:28 03/31/04, Re:
(6)
All they have to tell you is that some of the medical record is processed - sm 09:24:16 03/31/04, Re:
(5)
If processed outside the facility, they DO have to tell you - who they use. Your atty will verify this. nm 13:37:12 03/31/04, Re:
(3)
Nope, my atty says they just have to tell you it "might" be outsourced. - sm 15:08:36 03/31/04, Re:
(2)
And since it is fact that if your private info leaves the US, it is placed at - risk. If there is a breach the provider is held liable. sm 11:32:25 04/01/04, Re:
(0)
What state are you in? Remind me never to live there! sm - Nan 16:45:18 03/31/04, Re:
(0)
Please quote statute on this. Thank you. nm - Nan 11:05:52 03/31/04, Re:
(0)
Right...my point is that many patients do not know about the - sm - Jeannie 05:00:37 03/31/04, Re:
(1)
Word's getting out. I ask every time at my MD's office sm - It's a sad day 08:26:49 04/01/04, Re:
(0)
Transdyne in Michigan ? - sm - Jeannie 17:39:43 03/30/04, Re:
(0)
There are many examples of MedQuist being sued for false charges... - .. 12:17:51 03/30/04, Re:
(4)
Wow, and this is just the tip of the iceberg! nm - Nan 13:34:58 03/30/04, Re:
(3)
MEDQUIST - Tamara Carden 18:48:00 03/30/04, Re:
(2)
fired? - Kat 21:20:52 04/05/04, Re:
(0)
Why were you fired after ten years. - Curious 06:20:08 03/31/04, Re:
(0)
Great article by David Lazarus! - Covered Entity sm 08:03:41 03/28/04, Re:
(45)
Interesting quote from Senator Figueroa....sm - Jay Vance 06:33:43 03/29/04, Re:
(42)
The consumer has to be NOTIFIED first in order for them to have any "power" sm - TJ 07:38:07 03/29/04, Re:
(36)
I totally agree. I have no problem with disclosure...sm - Jay Vance 07:47:11 03/29/04, Re:
(35)
They'll NEVER ban offshore outsourcing because if they did - Covered Entity sm 08:54:57 03/29/04, Re:
(34)
That doesn't make sense. Wouldn't other countries ban our imports no matter - what law got passed, if that law ended up costing them money? nm 15:05:58 03/29/04, Re:
(0)
So do you believe that pushing for legislation to ban offshore outsourcing...sm - Jay Vance 08:57:35 03/29/04, Re:
(32)
No. I believe it IS a wise use of time and energy for whoever wants - Covered Entity sm 09:03:30 03/29/04, Re:
(31)
I'm expressing my opinions but I'm attacking no one...sm - Jay Vance 09:21:04 03/29/04, Re:
(30)
Aren't you wasting YOUR time and energy Jay? - .. 21:16:20 03/29/04, Re:
(0)
I disagree. When you continue to argue and debate those who - Covered Entity sm 09:54:40 03/29/04, Re:
(15)
My expertise and experience is in using the Internet to....sm - Jay Vance 10:08:19 03/29/04, Re:
(14)
No offense, Jay, but you are a very public person with your - Covered Entity sm 10:33:20 03/29/04, Re:
(13)
Thank you for helping me make my point....sm - Jay Vance 10:47:27 03/29/04, Re:
(12)
Not everything you post is a fact Jay. That's rather presumptuous on - Please....sm 12:26:19 03/29/04, Re:
(0)
I understand your concern about presenting differing arguments - Covered Entity sm 10:55:27 03/29/04, Re:
(10)
What I'm trying to accomplish....sm - Jay Vance 13:28:12 03/29/04, Re:
(9)
What YOU perceive as the best use of time and energy is YOUR OPINION - Covered Entity sm 14:01:19 03/29/04, Re:
(7)
I never said I was here to present both sides of this issue...sm - Jay Vance 14:26:50 03/29/04, Re:
(4)
You're right. You didn't say you were here to present both sides. - Covered Entity sm 17:26:36 03/29/04, Re:
(3)
The feedback from Jay to your post is going to get you a few things. sm - MHO 17:56:34 03/29/04, Re:
(2)
I agree with your 1, 2 and 3 points, but I haven't seen #4 and - Covered Entity sm 18:20:46 03/29/04, Re:
(0)
What I don't understand is why - sm 14:05:27 03/29/04, Re:
(1)
AAMT is a little late to the ball game if they intend to NOW pursue a course - Covered Entity sm 17:12:49 03/29/04, Re:
(0)
You do not present a balanced picture yourself. sm - Read this 13:36:12 03/29/04, Re:
(0)
And I suppose that would mean joining the AAMT and getting your CMT? nm - Nan 09:28:22 03/29/04, Re:
(12)
Joining AAMT is one way to work toward the goals I've mentioned....sm - Jay Vance 09:40:10 03/29/04, Re:
(11)
I believe an alternative organization is the viable answer...sm - Nan 09:53:31 03/29/04, Re:
(10)
An alternative/TRULY NATIONAL organization IS the answer. nm - .. 22:17:15 03/29/04, Re:
(1)
So start one. Although it might be tricky to keep out those who do not think - sm 03:39:38 03/30/04, Re:
(0)
I would not for a moment downplay the way you feel about AAMT....sm - Jay Vance 09:56:14 03/29/04, Re:
(7)
Nor do we have to feel the only OPTION is form another organization. - Covered Entity sm 10:03:35 03/29/04, Re:
(6)
Do you think Preziosi is going to do this all by himself? - sm 10:21:21 03/29/04, Re:
(0)
Do you think Preziosi is going to do this all by himself? - sm 10:06:58 03/29/04, Re:
(4)
Like I said, time will tell if the people at AAMT really ARE trying - Covered Entity sm 10:22:05 03/29/04, Re:
(3)
AAMT dropped the biggest ball they ever had in their court sm - Nan 12:28:01 03/29/04, Re:
(2)
MT Stars at this point deserves MAJOR applause, that's for sure! - Covered Entity sm 12:39:04 03/29/04, Re:
(1)
Boy, do I agree! nm - Glenda L. Findley 17:27:42 03/29/04, Re:
(0)
It would be typical of Jay to point this one thing out. I believe Senator - Figueroa was making a generalized statement and not specific to private health information. (sm) 07:12:44 03/29/04, Re:
(4)
Does that mean you now support PHI stripping? - nm 12:42:42 03/29/04, Re:
(2)
Has ANYONE at all addressed the medical malpractice that can occur - Covered Entity sm 14:03:19 03/29/04, Re:
(1)
They'll show up sooner or later, they always do, when 3rd world sm - Read this 14:14:09 03/29/04, Re:
(0)
I wasn't just referring to Figueroa's comment....sm - Jay Vance 07:45:38 03/29/04, Re:
(0)
To whoever said they know Spires is Newman's stepfather (sm) - TJ 17:21:58 03/28/04, Re:
(0)
It was an excellent article. I, however, would like to see the owner-sm - I agree 14:49:53 03/28/04, Re:
(0)
|
|
|
|
|
