|
|
|
| |
|
|
Company Board
01 - 02 - 03 - 04 - 05 - 06 - 07 - 08 - 09 - 10 - 11 - 12 - 13 - 14 - 15 - 16 - 17 - 18 - 19 - 20 - 21 - 22 - 23 - 24 - 25 - 26 - 27 - 28 - 29 - 30 - 31 - 32 - 33 - 34 - 35 - 36 - 37 - 38 - 39 - 40 - 41 - 42 - 43 - 44 - 45 - 46 - 47 - 48 - 49 - 50 - 51 - 52 - 53 - 54 - 55 - 56 - 57 - 58 - 59 - 60 - 61 - 62 - 63 - 64 - 65 - 66 - 67 - 68 - 69 - 70 - 71 - 72 - 73 - 74 - 75 - 76 - 77 - 78 - 79 - 80 - 81 - 82 - 83 - 84 - 85 - 86 - 87 -
Just got a letter from MQ in the mail that we have until September 30th to sign - nm 12:35:55 09/16/04, Re:
(13)
Actually the regular months you can switch over are December and June, but - they are allowing you to do so now as well to get the full 10 days PTO. nm 12:37:38 09/16/04, Re:
(12)
MQ gives nothing to no one, clients or transcriptionists. - Just ask yourself why? 13:10:03 09/16/04, Re:
(5)
to cut out the quarterly bonuses - my opinion only 16:04:54 09/16/04, Re:
(4)
Quarterly bonuses are to make up for PTO/vacation/benefits. - MQ needs SE employees! 16:25:20 09/16/04, Re:
(2)
There are a lot of companies that hire only full-time. sm - If that is what you like to think 08:15:06 09/18/04, Re:
(0)
IMO, most SE's don't truly fit the category and MQ knows it is looking at more - legal problems if it doesn't quit the IC business. nm 19:42:13 09/16/04, Re:
(0)
I have been wondering about that too. I bet that will go until everyone quits - me 16:08:41 09/16/04, Re:
(0)
What do they have against SE all of a sudden. - me 12:44:20 09/16/04, Re:
(5)
Damage control - Desperate MQ 13:06:03 09/16/04, Re:
(4)
I think we all realize this and I dont think they are going to get a huge amount - me 13:28:05 09/16/04, Re:
(3)
Nor would they want more trouble. - I don't think MQ can do away with SE 13:50:43 09/16/04, Re:
(2)
Maybe they will figure out a way on the platform to see that all employees get - me 13:53:05 09/16/04, Re:
(1)
And we have manipulative managers to do it. - Yes platform can be manipulated. 13:58:49 09/16/04, Re:
(0)
Any companies that let you work a M-F schedule? - nm 12:05:39 09/16/04, Re:
(3)
DSG does allow for M-F schedules - nm 12:10:38 09/16/04, Re:
(1)
Yep. I got a M-F schedule with DSG, too! - nm 22:46:48 09/16/04, Re:
(0)
The Back Suite Corporation - Mysteria 02:00:26 09/16/04, Re:
(0)
I hear there was a big shake up at CBay Detroit, formerly ATS today. Anyone - Anon 00:48:24 09/16/04, Re:
(2)
Shake up at CBay Detroit - Also ex-CBayer 09:53:40 09/16/04, Re:
(1)
They did buy EDS in March, which also offshores - ExCbayertoo 10:11:02 09/16/04, Re:
(0)
The personal insults, rudeness and fighting are going to stop right here, sm - Moderator 22:14:15 09/15/04, Re:
(1)
Rudeness - Carolyn 08:41:05 09/18/04, Re:
(0)
Any info on PT with Webmedex as far as - a rad MT 21:30:28 09/15/04, Re:
(4)
Been there 2 years, not 2 weeks. Yes, you have to sm - another opinion 04:59:21 09/16/04, Re:
(1)
Would have to agree with sm - Been Around 09:45:03 09/16/04, Re:
(0)
They are a definite stay away from kinda company - sm 21:34:21 09/15/04, Re:
(1)
I read only excellent posts where MDI-FL was concerned. I took a position sm - Can relate 05:00:24 09/19/04, Re:
(0)
Can someone explain to me why it seems we are attacking each other? - quietmoods 18:28:36 09/15/04, Re:
(5)
Personal Attacks - deb 13:36:15 09/17/04, Re:
(0)
Tell that to cherrypickers. They are - Well 10:17:53 09/16/04, Re:
(0)
beautifully put!!! TX - Thank you!! 21:18:22 09/15/04, Re:
(0)
Sixth line, first word, s/b see not seen (long 12 hour day) (nm) - quietmoods 18:30:31 09/15/04, Re:
(1)
Be a lover, not a fighter.... - Peacekeeper 21:34:12 09/16/04, Re:
(0)
www.RxEmployment.com - www.RxEmployment.com 17:55:45 09/15/04, Re:
(0)
Any PT SE MQers out there? - happy MQ-er (for now) 16:42:34 09/15/04, Re:
(12)
Your post fits me to a T. - mesascribe 14:33:53 09/16/04, Re:
(0)
My supervisor told me that - Another happy PT SE MQer 18:45:11 09/15/04, Re:
(1)
Get a job with the accounts MQ loses. - Transcription R US. 14:16:53 09/16/04, Re:
(0)
MQ SE - gracie 18:41:51 09/15/04, Re:
(1)
Or go down with Ship MQ. - Bring a bucket LOL 14:13:13 09/16/04, Re:
(0)
That is pretty much what I got out of the letter. I think the letter said...sm - AzMT 17:35:06 09/15/04, Re:
(1)
Oh I agree. With the problems with work shortages etc. I dont want to have to - me 17:55:24 09/15/04, Re:
(0)
I cant figure the plan either but I would expect the part times would go first - me 16:55:31 09/15/04, Re:
(4)
MQ - golfer 22:26:36 09/16/04, Re:
(3)
They are mailing letter from Corporate. When did they ask you to change over to - me 07:50:03 09/17/04, Re:
(2)
MQ game - GAMT 01:55:47 09/18/04, Re:
(1)
working for MQ - brheacmt 09:16:30 09/23/04, Re:
(0)
Transolutions - Nervous MQr 15:29:36 09/15/04, Re:
(16)
No shortage of work in the 7 months I've been there - happytransolutionsMT 22:18:18 09/15/04, Re:
(1)
transolutions is a great company to work for - lgara2002 14:40:41 09/16/04, Re:
(0)
I had no problem with the test. I start on the 28th. - sm 22:02:58 09/15/04, Re:
(13)
How much experience do you have? I - Okay 10:19:52 09/16/04, Re:
(12)
Maybe you are not as good as you think you are - PLEASE SEE MESSAGE 14:22:01 09/16/04, Re:
(7)
I'm not going to your level but you should be shot. - Pathetic 16:10:38 09/16/04, Re:
(6)
REALLY??..so that proves why you were denied a position...YOUR PSYCHO!! - Lady if i knew where you were i would be knockin on your door to see if your fat ass had enough nerve to say it to my face!! 21:41:27 09/16/04, Re:
(5)
As stated you should be shot. I am not the previous poster - Pathetic 02:44:42 09/17/04, Re:
(1)
Sounds to me like you made an ass of yourself..buttin in where you dont belong! - nm 16:29:47 09/17/04, Re:
(0)
you would think with her - she would have something better to do!! GOOD COMMENT 21:47:50 09/16/04, Re:
(2)
read this please... - mely 19:02:40 09/17/04, Re:
(1)
Beautiful sentiments, but i do not believe in the - X 23:40:49 09/17/04, Re:
(0)
I have 5 years experience and start at pay level 3. - sm 14:18:13 09/16/04, Re:
(0)
Okay, here we go again... - Transolutions employee 13:46:03 09/16/04, Re:
(0)
You really need to let this go!! nm - formertranscender 12:00:13 09/16/04, Re:
(1)
Transolutions - Orangeblossom 21:27:38 09/16/04, Re:
(0)
Zylomed North Florida - radtranz27 15:02:01 09/15/04, Re:
(1)
Zylomed - Lgt 12:54:08 09/20/04, Re:
(0)
Pay for a newbie - Diane 14:43:34 09/15/04, Re:
(0)
Waiting for the other shoe to drop. - Any more news about MQ 14:25:15 09/15/04, Re:
(0)
Does DSG....... - mmmmm 12:00:42 09/15/04, Re:
(1)
Training is done over the phone, sm - nm 12:07:00 09/15/04, Re:
(0)
Competitive pay...schmometitive pay, my A$$!! - BTDT 10:24:56 09/15/04, Re:
(2)
Trouble is - it's "competitive" for the client, not the transcriptionist - Whenever I see competitive pay in an ad, I know it's the lowest of the low. nm 16:23:29 09/15/04, Re:
(0)
I agree, i think it is such a joke!! - K 15:11:53 09/15/04, Re:
(0)
MQ Rocks, you are all just jealous. I love my job! - MQ is the best! 07:55:21 09/15/04, Re:
(20)
You enjoy working for a company who - What a shame 10:21:17 09/16/04, Re:
(1)
It All Depends on Which MQ office u work for! - VERY HAPPY MQer 23:00:10 09/16/04, Re:
(0)
OMG - GET REAL 15:15:02 09/15/04, Re:
(0)
feel bad about - meeetoo 11:59:45 09/15/04, Re:
(9)
I'm a SE at MQ and a full-time employee at sm - I'm with you 13:46:41 09/15/04, Re:
(3)
Pot calling the kettle black? - Stop whining about whining weinie. 14:21:39 09/15/04, Re:
(2)
3000 hospitals - sm 14:57:10 09/15/04, Re:
(1)
Just keep cheating me. - And you think the other hospitals will say never mind MQ? 19:02:48 09/15/04, Re:
(0)
They overcharged our hospital and we wont be using them again....bye bye MQ - looking in 13:44:00 09/15/04, Re:
(3)
well this should be a plus for the MTs. The hospital sm - Thinking out loud 13:48:48 09/15/04, Re:
(2)
It's not a plus to MQ MTs. - It depends. 14:23:13 09/15/04, Re:
(1)
I cannot play the wait and see game. I accepted a full-time job elsewhere. sm - I agree 09:02:07 09/16/04, Re:
(0)
To steal and lie. - Leaders have made decisions. 13:35:09 09/15/04, Re:
(0)
I agree, MQ ROCKS!! - Another Happy MQer 10:10:42 09/15/04, Re:
(0)
Do you really think we are jealous? Believe me, - sm 09:45:45 09/15/04, Re:
(0)
MQ is .... - eyetype 09:22:41 09/15/04, Re:
(0)
Speaking for you and others - Ashamed MQ 08:29:45 09/15/04, Re:
(0)
Hello!!! Have you read the latest... - RICO lawsuit MQ 08:11:48 09/15/04, Re:
(0)
I'm really happy with my job too! - Happy MQ'r too 08:07:59 09/15/04, Re:
(1)
Are you at a loss for words? - Jealous? 08:31:23 09/15/04, Re:
(0)
Is this board unmoderated, or is the moderator just selectively blind? - Some blatant personal attacks in threads below. nm 21:59:12 09/14/04, Re:
(2)
Personal attacks. - What's your problem? 22:03:40 09/14/04, Re:
(1)
You are a very annoying troll and you - need to be banned or asked to take your negativity elsewhere. - my 0.2 22:43:35 09/14/04, Re:
(0)
MQ sucks - Ashamed MQ 20:40:13 09/14/04, Re:
(0)
How long does it usually take to get test results back sm - Inquiring mind 12:56:51 09/14/04, Re:
(9)
Thanks for info! - nm. 21:33:56 09/14/04, Re:
(1)
MQ Sucks - No Problem 21:45:41 09/14/04, Re:
(0)
School, laboratory, driving? - Test results for what? 14:53:42 09/14/04, Re:
(2)
read the whole post--says test results for Webmedx - anon 15:28:08 09/14/04, Re:
(0)
Deliberately obtuse? - nm 15:26:40 09/14/04, Re:
(0)
I sent my test back over the weekend and heard back on Monday - AtHomeMT 13:20:01 09/14/04, Re:
(3)
I just received call from Webmedx I passed. - Inquiring mind 16:06:50 09/14/04, Re:
(2)
Congrats - AtHomeMT 16:11:47 09/14/04, Re:
(1)
thanks - Inquiring mind 17:21:28 09/14/04, Re:
(0)
Twice weekly pay - Amy 12:08:08 09/14/04, Re:
(13)
pay - MT 12:56:06 09/14/04, Re:
(3)
Pay - Amy 13:06:14 09/14/04, Re:
(2)
1500 every twoweeks - GAMT 02:09:19 09/18/04, Re:
(0)
MQ - MT 13:10:22 09/14/04, Re:
(0)
Are you new, have years of experience, just started a new job and the line sm - It depends 12:54:25 09/14/04, Re:
(0)
pay - AtHomeMT 12:34:18 09/14/04, Re:
(3)
If your making 1500 every two weeks why would you leave? - wondering 16:10:05 09/14/04, Re:
(2)
Because I believe I can make more - AtHomeMT 16:20:55 09/14/04, Re:
(1)
So true. Thanks for answering. - wondering 17:22:54 09/14/04, Re:
(0)
pay - AtHomeMT 12:33:51 09/14/04, Re:
(3)
Sorry about the double post--oops - AtHomeMT 12:35:29 09/14/04, Re:
(2)
Pay - Shelia 13:03:38 09/14/04, Re:
(1)
pay - AtHomeMT 13:18:56 09/14/04, Re:
(0)
OSI transcriptionists...a question for you... - possible OSI'er 09:23:45 09/14/04, Re:
(2)
Not so straight answers (sm) - Happy OSier 19:56:56 09/14/04, Re:
(1)
What is the AOL IM...sm - Anon 21:08:32 09/14/04, Re:
(0)
Lost account - MQr 08:08:13 09/14/04, Re:
(20)
Which office do you work for. - me 09:11:13 09/14/04, Re:
(19)
Columbia - MQr 09:38:34 09/14/04, Re:
(18)
Same situation and we are overstaffed on the platform because of loss of - me 13:49:13 09/14/04, Re:
(16)
Do you think MQ monitors these boards? - What office? 14:18:35 09/14/04, Re:
(15)
I hope they do monitor these boards. - me 14:34:28 09/14/04, Re:
(14)
What good would it do? - Why? 14:56:02 09/14/04, Re:
(13)
My office lost their accounts to another service. I dont know about yours. Wont - me 15:13:04 09/14/04, Re:
(12)
Dream on. - CSR level with a lowly transcriptionist? 16:09:26 09/14/04, Re:
(11)
Of course you get in trouble. - Ashamed MQ 11:15:40 09/14/04, Re:
(0)
Any suggestions on co. that have 24hr TAT? I have close to 7 years exp. w/ - IC MT 07:32:02 09/14/04, Re:
(0)
Anybody work for TASK out of California? nm - Curious 23:28:22 09/13/04, Re:
(4)
TASK sub - Jen 10:25:53 09/14/04, Re:
(3)
TASK - Late pay 14:20:01 09/14/04, Re:
(2)
Late pay - Jen 17:24:54 09/14/04, Re:
(1)
Does anyone else have something - Late pay 16:29:20 09/15/04, Re:
(0)
Protype - anon 18:24:00 09/13/04, Re:
(1)
ProType is good....but - Happy with job 08:04:57 09/15/04, Re:
(0)
production ?--have folks maintained pretty much the same line counts regardless - AtHomeMT 17:26:47 09/13/04, Re:
(4)
My line count varied because of diffferent transcription platforms. sm - Just me 17:43:39 09/13/04, Re:
(3)
No question is dumb :) sm - Just me 17:55:47 09/13/04, Re:
(1)
spelling police I meant word-based - just me 17:56:54 09/13/04, Re:
(0)
Wow, big difference. I'm ignorant, what do you mean by word base and non-word - AtHomeMT 17:51:40 09/13/04, Re:
(0)
DEP - newbie mq 17:25:18 09/13/04, Re:
(6)
Or ShortHand (nm) - GAPeach 09:44:01 09/14/04, Re:
(0)
I like DEP, but you do need an expander program other than what they have - built in to be productive IMO. I use IT. nm 19:14:55 09/13/04, Re:
(4)
Question about DEP - mesascribe 17:46:58 09/14/04, Re:
(1)
It is Word's Auto Correct. - nm 19:42:40 09/14/04, Re:
(0)
Expander? - newbie mq 19:26:41 09/13/04, Re:
(1)
Something like Instant Text (which is what I use) - sm 20:04:37 09/13/04, Re:
(0)
I believe - Ashamed MQ 16:37:56 09/13/04, Re:
(10)
I am not a Medquister and never was. The whining needs to stop. - MT 17:50:36 09/13/04, Re:
(9)
Huh? - Did I hear someone whine about whining? 18:00:04 09/13/04, Re:
(8)
MQ dosen't need damage control. They are constantly hiring new people sm - MT 18:05:20 09/13/04, Re:
(7)
You aren't paying attention or just not making sense. - Plenty of work 18:08:25 09/13/04, Re:
(6)
It is evident you are the one with issues. If MQ is a fraud, sm - MT 18:17:41 09/13/04, Re:
(5)
Try to focus - Changing your tune confused? 18:20:13 09/13/04, Re:
(4)
MQ doesn't phase me because I don't work for them. sm - MT 18:24:06 09/13/04, Re:
(3)
I would never have thought of that. - Why thanks! 18:28:34 09/13/04, Re:
(2)
Many do . . . but you are one of the whiners. - outside looking in 18:30:59 09/13/04, Re:
(1)
You are on the Company Board. - Lest you forget 18:32:57 09/13/04, Re:
(0)
I believe those who work for MQ and are not happy should move on. - My opinion 16:35:01 09/13/04, Re:
(1)
I would be willing to bet that most of those - am 20:50:24 09/13/04, Re:
(0)
Seasoned MT- 26 years Looking for decent pay and bennies! - dlo 16:23:19 09/13/04, Re:
(1)
They are running a hiring campaign. - Try MQ 16:25:21 09/13/04, Re:
(0)
Who works for X-Press Transcription? They sound like a very good company. NM - DJ 15:44:24 09/13/04, Re:
(7)
Once again, anybody but MQ - Ashamed MQ 15:46:55 09/13/04, Re:
(6)
What does your post have to do with X-Press? - Donna J. Hall 15:48:59 09/13/04, Re:
(5)
Go with X-press. - Anybody but MQ 15:54:40 09/13/04, Re:
(4)
Do you have anytnig substantive to offer about X-Press other than - go with them? nm 15:56:08 09/13/04, Re:
(3)
X-press has to be better than MQ - Sorry but....... 16:12:03 09/13/04, Re:
(2)
Again I ask.. anything substantive to say about X-PRESS????? - nm 16:16:53 09/13/04, Re:
(1)
X-PRESS APPRECIATES THEIR TRANSCRIPTIONIST AND PAYS THEM WELL - TIA 17:16:55 09/13/04, Re:
(0)
OSI or Alltype? - Mummums 15:33:11 09/13/04, Re:
(3)
Happy OSi'er - sm - B Vak 23:01:16 09/17/04, Re:
(0)
Haven't worked for either, but.....SM - GT 04:18:00 09/14/04, Re:
(0)
Anybody but MQ. - Ashamed MQ 15:45:05 09/13/04, Re:
(0)
More mail from Medquist! - Can you believe this? 15:28:26 09/13/04, Re:
(3)
There is a discussion about this below. - nm 15:44:35 09/13/04, Re:
(2)
Sorry, I should have read before posting. - Yikes 15:48:31 09/13/04, Re:
(1)
No prob :) - nm 15:55:04 09/13/04, Re:
(0)
More mail from Medquist! - Can you believe this? 15:16:59 09/13/04, Re:
(1)
MedQuist Mail - arby 15:41:21 09/17/04, Re:
(0)
Does Spheris provide computer and a word expander program? - AtHomeMT 15:04:12 09/13/04, Re:
(5)
Yes. At least they did when I worked there six months ago - nm 15:24:10 09/13/04, Re:
(4)
Thanks. Not there anymore? - AtHomeMT 15:30:09 09/13/04, Re:
(3)
You are welcome. Sure, I left because - sm 15:34:35 09/13/04, Re:
(2)
Thanks. If the defy3 rule has to do with spaces, it is my understanding it has - AtHomeMT 17:15:30 09/13/04, Re:
(1)
oops, I meant BLANKS not spaces in my post about defy3 rule - AtHomeMT 17:18:17 09/13/04, Re:
(0)
More propaganda from MQ in the mail - Ashamed MQ 14:33:08 09/13/04, Re:
(0)
MQ defenders - Ashamed MQ 14:16:52 09/13/04, Re:
(3)
Who knows the investigation was internal and not by the SEC? - Who thinks MQ is any different from any other company out there? nm 15:46:35 09/13/04, Re:
(1)
Investigation WAS internal, not anymore. - Check facts before posting 15:51:50 09/13/04, Re:
(0)
Bet they cannot answer that one!! - nm 14:40:17 09/13/04, Re:
(0)
To all of you who whine and complain about MQ constantly.... - Find a new job if you are so unhappy and get OVER it already! NM 10:54:56 09/13/04, Re:
(34)
Or this instead... - phobus1x9 13:25:54 09/13/04, Re:
(2)
Labor Day march? - ? 13:34:20 09/13/04, Re:
(1)
Solidarity. It's what's for dinner. - phobus1x9 14:20:04 09/13/04, Re:
(0)
Maybe I left for a reason (3 years ago)--SM - Maybe 13:18:21 09/13/04, Re:
(13)
Okay, you left 3 years ago GET OVER IT already. - nm 15:39:44 09/13/04, Re:
(11)
This MUST be management--Yeah, you worked hard learning - May 17:45:57 09/13/04, Re:
(1)
MQ management damage control. - Guarantee: 18:22:38 09/13/04, Re:
(0)
Obviously you have no experience with what MQ did to - May 17:26:22 09/13/04, Re:
(3)
and undercut all line rates to hospitals because they anticipated VR - May 17:31:30 09/13/04, Re:
(2)
Believe me, I am on their VR and it is terrible. They are not going to be - me 17:40:34 09/13/04, Re:
(1)
Interesting. I'm still waiting for improvements in MT SM - May 13:32:25 09/14/04, Re:
(0)
Got the message? - maybe MQ is worse than 3 years ago. 16:06:33 09/13/04, Re:
(4)
And maybe not. - nm 16:17:45 09/13/04, Re:
(3)
Was MQ being investigated by SEC for overbilling three years ago? - Better now? 16:35:43 09/13/04, Re:
(0)
Way worse. - nm 16:33:03 09/13/04, Re:
(1)
Be specific - How so way worse? 16:44:24 09/13/04, Re:
(0)
And they want people to become employees. - RIGHT 13:36:16 09/13/04, Re:
(0)
To those of you (YOU OP) who are holier than thou - go away 13:01:48 09/13/04, Re:
(4)
And the pot calls the kettle black. - nm 15:52:05 09/13/04, Re:
(0)
Could this be management posting? - LOL 13:08:51 09/13/04, Re:
(2)
I totally agree. Must have been. Nothing else can - explain that!! 14:39:10 09/13/04, Re:
(0)
Wonder if Marlton can explain why it is so hush hush about the hospitals being - nm 13:28:05 09/13/04, Re:
(0)
There are a lot more people who dislike MQ and dont post here. There - me 12:11:26 09/13/04, Re:
(3)
There are a lot of happy MQers who don't post either. If I'm happy with MQ I am - doing damage control? I bet you're a liberal Kerry supporter, too. nm 15:43:29 09/13/04, Re:
(1)
Damage control for MQ is crazy! - Bush supporter 16:10:21 09/13/04, Re:
(0)
Damage control indeed - Ashamed MQ 12:35:43 09/13/04, Re:
(0)
new job - Ashamed MQ 11:17:40 09/13/04, Re:
(7)
LOL...you're not biased or bitter, are you? - It makes your opinion so believable. nm 11:43:55 09/13/04, Re:
(6)
Opinion or facts? - Ashamed MQ 11:55:10 09/13/04, Re:
(4)
I work for MQ and am very happy, I don't need your so-called - facts or your opinion. nm 15:41:04 09/13/04, Re:
(3)
Don't let facts confuse you. - Ashamed MQ 16:15:52 09/13/04, Re:
(2)
I feel very sad for you. If you actually did/do work for them - I bet they are sorry they hired you. I would be. nm 16:19:07 09/13/04, Re:
(1)
So sorry. - Facts do confuse you. 16:49:09 09/13/04, Re:
(0)
Biased or bitter? - Ashamed MQ 11:53:21 09/13/04, Re:
(0)
Poll - Ashamed of MQ 09:44:10 09/13/04, Re:
(18)
I'm paid fairly and can verify my line count. It is always accurate. - happy MQer 10:51:56 09/13/04, Re:
(10)
My lines and pay are accurate but I just wonder why it has changed on the - nm 12:04:08 09/13/04, Re:
(7)
Why do you think it takes so long? - Ashamed MQ 12:10:53 09/13/04, Re:
(0)
Line count on DEP - MQ DEP question 12:08:02 09/13/04, Re:
(5)
Remember how they told us DEP would increase our lines. Give me a break. Same - GF 12:27:58 09/13/04, Re:
(1)
DEP line count - ? 12:31:38 09/13/04, Re:
(0)
If your accounts get too far behind they will farm them out and there will be no - JR 12:18:08 09/13/04, Re:
(2)
DEP line counts - ? 12:29:49 09/13/04, Re:
(1)
I dont know but it is pretty well across the board. Cant seem to get a straight - nm 12:35:13 09/13/04, Re:
(0)
I agree - Aeb 11:44:06 09/13/04, Re:
(1)
running out of work lately - maybe so 12:01:09 09/13/04, Re:
(0)
Instead of complaining why not just move on? - New to MQ 10:51:08 09/13/04, Re:
(6)
This is great! Don't expect to work at a long-term position, just "move on" SM - mabe s 13:37:02 09/14/04, Re:
(0)
Increase production? Move on? - Another MQ'er 13:27:48 09/13/04, Re:
(1)
Ditto - ? 13:42:55 09/13/04, Re:
(0)
MQ has lost tons of excellent transcriptionists from my office that they tried - MD 12:25:22 09/13/04, Re:
(1)
Leaving MQ - ? 12:34:27 09/13/04, Re:
(0)
MQ values, fair pay and otherwise. - Ashamed MQ 11:23:26 09/13/04, Re:
(0)
|
|
|
|
|
